↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Replacement of Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation: Adverse Events and Risk Factors in a Multicenter Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical Replacement of Implantable Pulse Generators in Deep Brain Stimulation: Adverse Events and Risk Factors in a Multicenter Cohort
Published in
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, August 2016
DOI 10.1159/000447521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Fytagoridis, Tomas Heard, Jennifer Samuelsson, Peter Zsigmond, Elena Jiltsova, Simon Skyrman, Thomas Skoglund, Terry Coyne, Peter Silburn, Patric Blomstedt

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a growing treatment modality, and most DBS systems require replacement of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) every few years. The literature regarding the potential impact of adverse events of IPG replacement on the longevity of DBS treatments is rather scarce. To investigate the incidence of adverse events, including postoperative infections, associated with IPG replacements in a multicenter cohort. The medical records of 808 patients from one Australian and five Swedish DBS centers with a total of 1,293 IPG replacements were audited. A logistic regression model was used to ascertain the influence of possible predictors on the incidence of adverse events. The overall incidence of major infections was 2.3% per procedure, 3.7% per patient and 1.7% per replaced IPG. For 28 of 30 patients this resulted in partial or complete DBS system removal. There was an increased risk of infection for males (OR 3.6, p = 0.026), and the risk of infection increased with the number of prior IPG replacements (OR 1.6, p < 0.005). The risk of postoperative infection with DBS IPG replacement increases with the number of previous procedures. There is a need to reduce the frequency of IPG replacements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 46%
Neuroscience 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 14 34%