Title |
Sustained employability of workers in a production environment: design of a stepped wedge trial to evaluate effectiveness and cost-benefit of the POSE program
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Berry J van Holland, Michiel R de Boer, Sandra Brouwer, Remko Soer, Michiel F Reneman |
Abstract |
Sustained employability and health are generating awareness of employers in an aging and more complex work force. To meet these needs, employers may offer their employees health surveillance programs, to increase opportunities to work on health and sustained employability. However, evidence for these health surveillance programs is lacking. The FLESH study (Functional Labour Evaluation for Sustained Health and employment) was developed to evaluate a comprehensive workers' health promotion program on its effectiveness, cost-benefit, and process of the intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 15% |
Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 21% |
Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
Psychology | 9 | 8% |
Engineering | 7 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 18% |
Unknown | 35 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,172,971
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,801
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,529
of 275,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#284
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.