↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 X users

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional annotation of the 2q35 breast cancer risk locus implicates a structural variant in influencing activity of a long-range enhancer element
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, June 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.05.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph S. Baxter, Nichola Johnson, Katarzyna Tomczyk, Andrea Gillespie, Sarah Maguire, Rachel Brough, Laura Fachal, Kyriaki Michailidou, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Thomas U. Ahearn, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Natalia N. Antonenkova, Volker Arndt, Kristan J. Aronson, Annelie Augustinsson, Heiko Becher, Matthias W. Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Javier Benitez, Marina Bermisheva, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Hermann Brenner, Sara Y. Brucker, Qiuyin Cai, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Jose E. Castelao, Tsun L. Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Ji-Yeob Choi, Christine L. Clarke, NBCS Collaborators, Sarah Colonna, Don M. Conroy, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B. Daly, Peter Devilee, Thilo Dörk, Laure Dossus, Miriam Dwek, Diana M. Eccles, Arif B. Ekici, A. Heather Eliassen, Christoph Engel, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine Figueroa, Henrik Flyger, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Chi Gao, Montserrat García-Closas, José A. García-Sáenz, Maya Ghoussaini, Graham G. Giles, Mark S. Goldberg, Anna González-Neira, Pascal Guénel, Melanie Gündert, Lothar Haeberle, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A. Haiman, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Mikael Hartman, Sigrid Hatse, Jan Hauke, Antoinette Hollestelle, Reiner Hoppe, John L. Hopper, Ming-Feng Hou, kConFab Investigators, ABCTB Investigators, Hidemi Ito, Motoki Iwasaki, Agnes Jager, Anna Jakubowska, Wolfgang Janni, Esther M. John, Vijai Joseph, Audrey Jung, Rudolf Kaaks, Daehee Kang, Renske Keeman, Elza Khusnutdinova, Sung-Won Kim, Veli-Matti Kosma, Peter Kraft, Vessela N. Kristensen, Katerina Kubelka-Sabit, Allison W. Kurian, Ava Kwong, James V. Lacey, Diether Lambrechts, Nicole L. Larson, Susanna C. Larsson, Loic Le Marchand, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Jingmei Li, Jirong Long, Artitaya Lophatananon, Jan Lubiński, Arto Mannermaa, Mehdi Manoochehri, Siranoush Manoukian, Sara Margolin, Keitaro Matsuo, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Rebecca Mayes, Usha Menon, Roger L. Milne, Nur Aishah Mohd Taib, Kenneth Muir, Taru A. Muranen, Rachel A. Murphy, Heli Nevanlinna, Katie M. O’Brien, Kenneth Offit, Janet E. Olson, Håkan Olsson, Sue K. Park, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Alpa V. Patel, Paolo Peterlongo, Julian Peto, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Nadege Presneau, Katri Pylkäs, Brigitte Rack, Gad Rennert, Atocha Romero, Matthias Ruebner, Thomas Rüdiger, Emmanouil Saloustros, Dale P. Sandler, Elinor J. Sawyer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Rita K. Schmutzler, Andreas Schneeweiss, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Mitul Shah, Chen-Yang Shen, Xiao-Ou Shu, Jacques Simard, Melissa C. Southey, Jennifer Stone, Harald Surowy, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rulla M. Tamimi, William J. Tapper, Jack A. Taylor, Soo Hwang Teo, Lauren R. Teras, Mary Beth Terry, Amanda E. Toland, Ian Tomlinson, Thérèse Truong, Chiu-Chen Tseng, Michael Untch, Celine M. Vachon, Ans M.W. van den Ouweland, Sophia S. Wang, Clarice R. Weinberg, Camilla Wendt, Stacey J. Winham, Robert Winqvist, Alicja Wolk, Anna H. Wu, Taiki Yamaji, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Alison M. Dunning, Douglas F. Easton, Stephen J. Pettitt, Christopher J. Lord, Syed Haider, Nick Orr, Olivia Fletcher

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Unspecified 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 31 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 20%
Unspecified 5 8%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 33 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,283,600
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#648
of 7,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,919
of 488,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#13
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.