| Title |
Predicting mortality risk in patients undergoing venovenous ECMO for ARDS due to influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia: the ECMOnet score
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2747-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federico Pappalardo, Marina Pieri, Teresa Greco, Nicolò Patroniti, Antonio Pesenti, Antonio Arcadipane, V. Marco Ranieri, Luciano Gattinoni, Giovanni Landoni, Bernhard Holzgraefe, Gernot Beutel, Alberto Zangrillo |
| Abstract |
The decision to start venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is commonly based on the severity of respiratory failure, with little consideration of the extrapulmonary organ function. The aim of the study was to identify predictors of mortality and to develop a score allowing a better stratification of patients at the time of VV ECMO initiation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 20% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 45 | 26% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,134,804
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,659
of 5,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,652
of 162,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.