↓ Skip to main content

German translation and validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire–IUGA revised (PISQ-IR)

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
German translation and validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire–IUGA revised (PISQ-IR)
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00192-016-2969-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerda Trutnovsky, Eva Nagele, Daniela Ulrich, Thomas Aigmüller, Daniela Dörfler, Ingrid Geiss, Evi Reinstadler, Johannes Angleitner-Flotzinger, Jean-Jacques Ries, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, on behalf of the Austrian Urogynecology Working Group

Abstract

Condition-specific sexual questionnaires are essential for clinical trials and important patient-reported outcome measures. The aim of the study was to translate the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-International Urogynecology Association Revised (PISQ-IR) into German and to clinically validate it in a German-speaking population. The translated PISQ-IR was linguistically validated in two rounds of cognitive interviews. The final instrument was psychometrically validated in women presenting to urogynecological clinics with pelvic floor dysfunction. For analysis of criterion validity, three related self-reported measures were administered: the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Kings Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). For external validity, PISQ-IR subscales were compared to the clinical-measures Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) stage, pelvic floor muscle tone, and Oxford Grading Scale. Descriptive statistics, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and Pearson correlations were calculated for all PISQ-IR subscales. The PISQ-IR was completed by 197 women, out of whom 66 (33.5 %) considered themselves not sexually active (NSA) and 131 (66.5 %) as sexually active (SA). Participants' mean age was 57 ± 12 years; 50 % were diagnosed with symptomatic POP, 74 % with urinary incontinence (UI) and 4 % with anal incontinence (AI). The PISQ-IR subscales were analyzed separately for SA and NSA women with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.64 to 0.94. Moderate to high correlations were observed between PISQ-IR subscales and related quality of life (QoL) scales and corresponding FSFI scales. Initial testing of the German PISQ-IR suggests it is an internally consistent and valid tool for use in clinical practice and research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Psychology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 24 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1,978
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,595
of 311,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#32
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.