↓ Skip to main content

The viscosity of hydrous dacitic liquids: implications for the rheology of evolving silicic magmas

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
The viscosity of hydrous dacitic liquids: implications for the rheology of evolving silicic magmas
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00445-008-0217-y
Authors

Alan G. Whittington, Bridget M. Hellwig, Harald Behrens, Bastian Joachim, André Stechern, Francesco Vetere

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 29%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 9 12%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 56 73%
Engineering 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Chemistry 1 1%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,330
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,604
of 82,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.