| Title |
Evaluating the Impact of a Single-Day Multidisciplinary Clinic on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-008-9929-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy M. Pawlik, Daniel Laheru, Ralph H. Hruban, JoAnn Coleman, Christopher L. Wolfgang, Kurt Campbell, Syed Ali, Elliot K. Fishman, Richard D. Schulick, Joseph M. Herman, the Johns Hopkins Multidisciplinary Pancreas Clinic Team |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| China | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 29 | 25% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,272,422
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#479
of 7,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,765
of 88,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.