↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir Combination in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Factors Associated With Sustained Virologic Response

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
53 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir Combination in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Factors Associated With Sustained Virologic Response
Published in
Gastroenterology, August 2016
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norah A. Terrault, Stefan Zeuzem, Adrian M. Di Bisceglie, Joseph K. Lim, Paul J. Pockros, Lynn M. Frazier, Alexander Kuo, Anna S. Lok, Mitchell L. Shiffman, Ziv Ben Ari, Lucy Akushevich, Monika Vainorius, Mark S. Sulkowski, Michael W. Fried, David R. Nelson, HCV-TARGET Study Group, David R. Nelson, Michael W. Fried

Abstract

The combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir has been approved for treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, including an 8-week regimen for treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis and a baseline level of HCV RNA <6 million IU/mL. We analyzed data from a multicenter, prospective, observational study to determine real-world sustained virologic responses 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) with regimens containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir and identify factors associated with treatment failure. We collected data from 2099 participants in the HCV-TARGET study with complete virologic data (per protocol population). We analyzed data from 1788 patients receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (282 for 8 weeks, 910 for 12 weeks, 510 for 24 weeks, and 86 for a different duration) and 311 receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (212 for 12 weeks and 81 for 24 weeks, 18 for other duration) to estimate SVR12 (with 95% CI), and logistic regression methods to identify factors that predicted an SVR12. The overall study population was 25% Black, 66% with HCV genotype 1A infection, 41% with cirrhosis, 50% treatment experienced, and 30% receiving proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at start of treatment. In the per protocol population, SVR12s were achieved by 96% of patients receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 8 weeks (95% CI, 93%-98%), 97% receiving the drugs for 12 weeks (95% CI, 96%-98%), and 95% receiving the drugs for 24 weeks (95% CI, 93%-97%). Among patients also receiving ribavirin, SVR12s were achieved by 97% of the patients receiving the drugs for 12 weeks (95% CI, 94%-99%) and 95% receiving the drugs for 24 weeks (95% CI, 88%-99%). Of the 586 patients who qualified for 8 weeks treatment, only 255 (44%) received the drugs for 8 weeks. The rate of SVR12 among those who qualified for and received 8 weeks therapy was similar in those who qualified for 8 weeks but received 12 weeks therapy (96%; 95% CI, 92%-99% vs 98%; 95% CI, 95%-99%). Factors that predicted SVR12 were higher albumin (≥3.5 g/dL), lower total bilirubin (≤1.2 g/dL), absence of cirrhosis, and absence of PPI use. Regimens containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir are highly effective for a broad spectrum of patients with HCV genotype 1 infection treated in different clinical practice settings. Expanded use of 8-week treatment regimens for eligible patients is supported by these real-world results. Modification of PPI use may increase rates of SVR. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01474811.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 14%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 49 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 422. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#68,310
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#52
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,518
of 352,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#2
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.