You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of intensive structured care on individual blood pressure targets in primary care: multicentre randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.e7156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Stewart, Melinda J Carrington, Carla H Swemmer, Craig Anderson, Nicol P Kurstjens, John Amerena, Alex Brown, Louise M Burrell, Ferdinandus J de Looze, Mark Harris, Joseph Hung, Henry Krum, Mark Nelson, Markus Schlaich, Nigel P Stocks, Garry L Jennings |
| Abstract |
To determine the effectiveness of intensive structured care to optimise blood pressure control based on individual absolute risk targets in primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Morocco | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2013.
All research outputs
#3,757,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#26,873
of 64,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,275
of 285,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#284
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.