↓ Skip to main content

Sheathfolds in rheomorphic ignimbrites

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sheathfolds in rheomorphic ignimbrites
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00445-003-0332-8
Authors

M. J. Branney, T. L. Barry, M. Godchaux

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Costa Rica 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 37%
Researcher 11 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 69%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,330
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,003
of 54,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.