↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Positive Youth Development Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of Positive Youth Development Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10964-016-0555-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oana Ciocanel, Kevin Power, Ann Eriksen, Kirsty Gillings

Abstract

Positive youth development is thought to be essential to the prevention of adolescent risk behavior and the promotion of thriving. This meta-analysis examined the effects of positive youth development interventions in promoting positive outcomes and reducing risk behavior. Ten databases and grey literature were scanned using a predefined search strategy. We included studies that focused on young people aged 10-19 years, implemented a positive youth development intervention, were outside school hours, and utilized a randomized controlled design. Twenty-four studies, involving 23,258 participants, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The impact of the interventions on outcomes including behavioral problems, sexual risk behavior, academic achievement, prosocial behavior and psychological adjustment were assessed. Positive youth development interventions had a small but significant effect on academic achievement and psychological adjustment. No significant effects were found for sexual risk behaviors, problem behavior or positive social behaviors. Intervention effects were independent of program characteristics and participant age. Low-risk young people derived more benefit from positive youth development interventions than high-risk youth. The studies examined had several methodological flaws, which weakened the ability to draw conclusions. Substantial progress has been made in the theoretical understanding of youth development in the past two decades. This progress needs to be matched in the intervention literature, through the use of high-quality evaluation research of positive youth development programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 317 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Researcher 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 110 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 24%
Social Sciences 56 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 118 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,447,616
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#315
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,095
of 361,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.