| Title |
Religious and Non-Religious Coping in Lung Transplant Candidates: Does Adding God to the Picture Tell Us More?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10865-005-9025-4 |
| Authors |
Eileen J. Burker, Donna M. Evon, Jan A. Sedway, Thomas Egan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 25% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#810
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,800
of 59,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.