↓ Skip to main content

Remaking the Self: Trauma, Teachable Moments, and the Biopolitics of Cancer Survivorship

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Remaking the Self: Trauma, Teachable Moments, and the Biopolitics of Cancer Survivorship
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11013-012-9276-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten Bell

Abstract

As numerous scholars have noted, cancer survivorship is often represented in popular discourse as providing an opportunity for a physical, emotional, and spiritual makeover. However, this idea that cancer enables the self to be remade on all levels is also increasingly evoked in the field of psychosocial oncology. Exploring cancer survivorship as a biopolitical phenomenon, I focus on two concepts that have become central to understandings of the disease: the "teachable moment" and "post-traumatic growth." Drawing primarily on representations of cancer survivorship in the clinical literature, I suggest that cancer is increasingly seen to present a unique opportunity to catalyze the patient's physical and psychological development. In this framework, the patient can no longer be relied upon to transform him or herself: this change must be externally driven, with clinicians taking advantage of the trauma that cancer entails to kick-start the patient into action. Broadening my analysis to the concepts of "trauma" and "development" writ large, I go on to suggest that survivorship discourse seems to partake of a larger and relatively recent meta-narrative about development-both individual and societal--and the positive opportunity that trauma is seen to present to stimulate reconstruction on a grand scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
China 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 28%
Psychology 21 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,012,380
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#84
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,465
of 190,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.