↓ Skip to main content

Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7

Overview of attention for article published in European Biophysics Journal, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 511)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1911 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1184 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7
Published in
European Biophysics Journal, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00249-011-0700-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan Schmid, Andreas P. Eichenberger, Alexandra Choutko, Sereina Riniker, Moritz Winger, Alan E. Mark, Wilfred F. van Gunsteren

Abstract

New parameter sets of the GROMOS biomolecular force field, 54A7 and 54B7, are introduced. These parameter sets summarise some previously published force field modifications: The 53A6 helical propensities are corrected through new φ/ψ torsional angle terms and a modification of the N-H, C=O repulsion, a new atom type for a charged -CH(3) in the choline moiety is added, the Na(+) and Cl(-) ions are modified to reproduce the free energy of hydration, and additional improper torsional angle types for free energy calculations involving a chirality change are introduced. The new helical propensity modification is tested using the benchmark proteins hen egg-white lysozyme, fox1 RNA binding domain, chorismate mutase and the GCN4-p1 peptide. The stability of the proteins is improved in comparison with the 53A6 force field, and good agreement with a range of primary experimental data is obtained.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 6 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 11 <1%
Unknown 1148 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 267 23%
Researcher 180 15%
Student > Master 128 11%
Student > Bachelor 115 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 82 7%
Other 161 14%
Unknown 251 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 284 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 183 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 11%
Engineering 49 4%
Physics and Astronomy 47 4%
Other 185 16%
Unknown 307 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,316,056
of 23,989,432 outputs
Outputs from European Biophysics Journal
#3
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,197
of 111,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Biophysics Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them