| Title |
Impact of type D personality on adherence to oral appliance therapy for sleep-disordered breathing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sleep and Breathing, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11325-012-0788-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Dieltjens, O. M. Vanderveken, D. Van den Bosch, K. Wouters, J. Denollet, J. A. Verbraecken, P. H. Van de Heyning, M. J. Braem |
| Abstract |
Type D personality, defined as a combination of social inhibition and negative affectivity, has been associated with poor medication adherence and lower adherence to continuous positive airway pressure in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Up to this date, the association of patient's personality with adherence with a mandibular advancement device (MAD) has not been studied. The purposes of this study were to examine the association between type D personality and poor adherence to MAD treatment and to examine the impact of type D personality on perceived side effects during this treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 46% |
| Psychology | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,026,381
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#204
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,999
of 179,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.