↓ Skip to main content

Physical Demands of Representative Match-Play in Adolescent Rugby Union

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical Demands of Representative Match-Play in Adolescent Rugby Union
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001600
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dale B. Read, Ben Jones, Padraic J. Phibbs, Gregory A.B. Roe, Joshua D. Darrall-Jones, Jonathon J.S. Weakley, Kevin Till

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the physical demands of representative adolescent rugby union match-play and investigate the difference between playing positions and age groups. Players (n=112) were classified into 6 groups by playing position (forwards and backs) and age group (U16, U18, U20). The physical demands were measured using microsensor-based technology and analysed using magnitude based inferences to assess practical importance. Backs had a greater relative distance (except U16s) and a greater high-speed running distance per minute than forwards, with the magnitude of difference between the positions becoming larger in older age groups. Forwards had higher values of PlayerLoad per minute (accumulated accelerations from the three axes of movement) and PlayerLoad slow per minute (accumulated accelerations from the three axes of movement where velocity is <2 m.s) than backs at all age groups. Relative distance, low- and high-speed running per minute all had a trend to be lower in older age groups for both positions. PlayerLoad per minute was greater in U18 than U16 and U20 for both positions. PlayerLoad slow per minute was greater for older age groups besides the U18 and U20 comparisons, which were unclear. The contrasts in physical demands experienced by different positions reinforce the need for greater exposure to sprinting and collision based activity for backs and forwards, respectively. Given PlayerLoad metrics peak at U18 and locomotor demands seem to be lower in older ages, the demands of representative adolescent rugby union do not seem to be greater at U20 as expected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 60 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 38 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,605,740
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#1,275
of 6,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,493
of 324,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#27
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.