↓ Skip to main content

Left atrial volumetric assessment using a novel automated framework for 3D echocardiography: a multi-centre analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Left atrial volumetric assessment using a novel automated framework for 3D echocardiography: a multi-centre analysis
Published in
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, August 2016
DOI 10.1093/ehjci/jew166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuno Almeida, Alexandros Papachristidis, Peter Pearson, Sebastian Imre Sarvari, Jan Engvall, Thor Edvardsen, Mark Monaghan, Olivier Gérard, Eigil Samset, Jan D'hooge

Abstract

This study aims at validating a software tool for automated segmentation and quantification of the left atrium (LA) from 3D echocardiography. The LA segmentation tool uses a dual-chamber model of the left side of the heart to automatically detect and track the atrio-ventricular plane and the LA endocardium in transthoracic 3D echocardiography. The tool was tested in a dataset of 121 ultrasound images from patients with several cardiovascular pathologies (in a multi-centre setting), and the resulting volumes were compared with those assessed manually by experts in a blinded analysis using conventional contouring. Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the automated method and the manual references, with differences (mean ± 1.96 SD) of 0.5 ± 5.7 mL for LA minimum volume and -1.6 ± 9.7 mL for LA maximum volume (comparable to the inter-observer variability of manual tracings). The automated tool required no user interaction in 93% of the recordings, while 4% required a single click and only 2% required contour adjustments, reducing considerably the amount of time and effort required for LA volumetric analysis. The automated tool was validated in a multi-centre setting, providing quantification of the LA volume over the cardiac cycle with minimal user interaction. The results of the automated analysis were in agreement with those estimated manually by experts. This study shows that such approach has clinical utility for the assessment of the LA morphology and function, automating and facilitating the time-consuming task of analysing 3D echocardiographic recordings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Engineering 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,788
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,711
of 2,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,229
of 343,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.