↓ Skip to main content

Supporting Mathematical Discussions: the Roles of Comparison and Cognitive Load

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Supporting Mathematical Discussions: the Roles of Comparison and Cognitive Load
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10648-016-9382-2
Authors

Lindsey E. Richland, Kreshnik Nasi Begolli, Nina Simms, Rebecca R. Frausel, Emily A. Lyons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 24%
Researcher 11 11%
Lecturer 10 10%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 26%
Social Sciences 17 16%
Mathematics 13 13%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 34 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,571,055
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#402
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,618
of 358,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.