↓ Skip to main content

Scientific reasons to question teleconsultations in expert general practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Scientific reasons to question teleconsultations in expert general practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, May 2021
DOI 10.3399/bjgp21x716033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Reeve

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Other 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Chemistry 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,169,510
of 24,793,937 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#4,119
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,735
of 439,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#78
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,793,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.