You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trait-based filtering mediates the effects of realistic biodiversity losses on ecosystem functioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2022757118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amelia A. Wolf, Jennifer L. Funk, Paul C. Selmants, Connor N. Morozumi, Daniel L. Hernández, Jae R. Pasari, Erika S. Zavaleta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 35% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 10 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 33 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#637,339
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#10,835
of 103,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,003
of 456,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#269
of 965 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 965 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.