↓ Skip to main content

Improving Quality of Care in Substance Abuse Treatment Using Five key Process Improvement Principles

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Improving Quality of Care in Substance Abuse Treatment Using Five key Process Improvement Principles
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11414-011-9270-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim A. Hoffman, Carla A. Green, James H. Ford II, Jennifer P. Wisdom, David H. Gustafson, Dennis McCarty

Abstract

Process and quality improvement techniques have been successfully applied in health care arenas, but efforts to institute these strategies in alcohol and drug treatment are underdeveloped. The Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) teaches participating substance abuse treatment agencies to use process improvement strategies to increase client access to, and retention in, treatment. NIATx recommends five principles to promote organizational change: (1) understand and involve the customer, (2) fix key problems, (3) pick a powerful change leader, (4) get ideas from outside the organization, and (5) use rapid cycle testing. Using case studies, supplemented with cross-agency analyses of interview data, this paper profiles participating NIATx treatment agencies that illustrate successful applications of each principle. Results suggest that organizations can successfully integrate and apply the five principles as they develop and test change strategies, improving access and retention in treatment, and agencies' financial status. Upcoming changes requiring increased provision of behavioral health care will result in greater demand for services. Treatment organizations, already struggling to meet demand and client needs, will need strategies that improve the quality of care they provide without significantly increasing costs. The five NIATx principles have potential for helping agencies achieve these goals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 14 14%
Other 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Social Sciences 15 15%
Psychology 13 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,010,799
of 24,350,163 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#223
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,317
of 254,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,350,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.