↓ Skip to main content

The Handover Toolbox: a knowledge exchange and training platform for improving patient care

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Handover Toolbox: a knowledge exchange and training platform for improving patient care
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2012
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hendrik Drachsler, Wendy Kicken, Marcel van der Klink, Slavi Stoyanov, Henny P A Boshuizen, Paul Barach

Abstract

Safe and effective patient handovers remain a global organisational and training challenge. Limited evidence supports available handover training programmes. Customisable training is a promising approach to improve the quality and sustainability of handover training and outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 175 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 15 8%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 50 27%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 15%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Computer Science 12 6%
Design 8 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 44 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2,332
of 2,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,381
of 285,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#37
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.