↓ Skip to main content

Resting and injury‐induced inflamed periosteum contain multiple macrophage subsets that are located at sites of bone growth and regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Immunology & Cell Biology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resting and injury‐induced inflamed periosteum contain multiple macrophage subsets that are located at sites of bone growth and regeneration
Published in
Immunology & Cell Biology, November 2016
DOI 10.1038/icb.2016.74
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kylie Anne Alexander, Liza‐Jane Raggatt, Susan Millard, Lena Batoon, Andy Chiu‐Ku Wu, Ming‐Kang Chang, David Arthur Hume, Allison Robyn Pettit

Abstract

Better understanding of bone growth and regeneration mechanisms within periosteal tissues will improve understanding of bone physiology and pathology. Macrophage contributions to bone biology and repair have been established but specific investigation of periosteal macrophages has not been undertaken. We used an immunohistochemistry approach to characterise macrophages in growing murine bone and within activated periosteum induced in a mouse model of bone injury. Osteal tissue macrophages (osteomacs) and resident macrophages were distributed throughout resting periosteum. Tissues were collected from 4 week old mice and osteomacs were observed intimately associated with sites of periosteal diaphyseal and metaphyseal bone dynamics associated with normal growth. This included F4/80(+)Mac-2(-/low) osteomac association with extended tracks of bone formation (modeling) on diphyseal periosteal surfaces. While this recapitulated endosteal osteomac characteristics, there was subtle variance in the morphology and spatial organization of modelling-associated osteomacs, which likely reflects the greater structural complexity of periosteum. We also demonstrated that osteomacs, resident macrophages and inflammatory macrophages (F4/80(+)Mac-2(hi)) were associated with the complex bone dynamics occurring within the periosteum at the metaphyseal corticalization zone. These 3 macrophage subsets were also present within activated native periosteum after bone injury across a 9 day time course that spanned the inflammatory through remodeling bone healing phases. This included osteomac association with foci of endochondral ossification within the activated native periosteum. These observations confirm that osteomacs are key components of both osteal tissues, in spite of salient differences between endosteal and periosteal structure and that multiple macrophage subsets are involved in periosteal bone dynamics.Immunology and Cell Biology accepted article preview online, 24 August 2016. doi:10.1038/icb.2016.74.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 12%
Engineering 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Immunology & Cell Biology
#1,594
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,377
of 312,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunology & Cell Biology
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.