You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Persistent Disparities between Recent Rates of Habitat Conversion and Protection and Implications for Future Global Conservation Targets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12295 |
| Authors |
James E.M. Watson, Kendall R. Jones, Richard A. Fuller, Moreno Di Marco, Daniel B. Segan, Stuart H.M. Butchart, James R. Allan, Eve McDonald‐Madden, Oscar Venter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 189 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 11% |
| Australia | 16 | 8% |
| Canada | 8 | 4% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 129 | 68% |
| Scientists | 49 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 279 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 61 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 88 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 80 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#136,915
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#27
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,727
of 331,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.