↓ Skip to main content

Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults
Published in
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Kemper, Daniel Bontempo, RaLynn Schmalzried, Whitney McKedy, Bruno Tagliaferri, Doug Kieweg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 15 30%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 32%
Linguistics 6 12%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
#175
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,895
of 195,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.