↓ Skip to main content

The Significance of Reciprocal and Unilateral Friendships for Peer Victimization in Adolescence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
The Significance of Reciprocal and Unilateral Friendships for Peer Victimization in Adolescence
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10964-008-9287-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ron H. J. Scholte, Geertjan Overbeek, Giovanni ten Brink, Els Rommes, Raymond A. T. de Kemp, Luc Goossens, Rutger C. M. E. Engels

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 53%
Social Sciences 11 16%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#1,342
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,934
of 83,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.