↓ Skip to main content

Time Estimation in Good and Poor Sleepers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Time Estimation in Good and Poor Sleepers
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10865-005-9021-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine S. Fichten, Laura Creti, Rhonda Amsel, Sally Bailes, Eva Libman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 28%
Neuroscience 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Unspecified 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,416
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#810
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,858
of 146,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.