↓ Skip to main content

The Factor Structure of Gambling-Related Cognitions in an Undergraduate University Sample

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
The Factor Structure of Gambling-Related Cognitions in an Undergraduate University Sample
Published in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10862-007-9063-z
Authors

Richard E. Mattson, James MacKillop, Bryan A. Castelda, Emily J. Anderson, Peter J. Donovick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Philosophy 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
#391
of 683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,490
of 71,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.