↓ Skip to main content

The Predictive Utility of Early Childhood Disruptive Behaviors for School-Age Social Functioning

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
The Predictive Utility of Early Childhood Disruptive Behaviors for School-Age Social Functioning
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10802-014-9967-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauretta M. Brennan, Daniel S. Shaw, Thomas J. Dishion, Melvin N. Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 41%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,411
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,703
of 360,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.