| Title |
Improving the Effectiveness of Virtual Teams by Adapting Team Processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10606-007-9070-3 |
| Authors |
Daniel J. Rice, Barry D. Davidson, John F. Dannenhoffer, Geri K. Gay |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 46 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Psychology | 18 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#201
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,675
of 84,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.