↓ Skip to main content

Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
373 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
498 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2000
DOI 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Göran Arnqvist, Martin Edvardsson, Urban Friberg, Tina Nilsson

Abstract

Speciation rates among extant lineages of organisms vary extensively, but our understanding of the causes of this variation and, therefore, the processes of speciation is still remarkably incomplete. Both theoretical and empirical studies have indicated that sexual selection is important in speciation, but earlier discussions have focused almost exclusively on the potential role of female mate choice. Recent findings of postmating reproductive conflicts of interest between the sexes suggest a quite different route to speciation. Such conflicts may lead to perpetual antagonistic coevolution between males and females and may thus generate rapid evolutionary divergence of traits involved in reproduction. Here, we assess this hypothesis by contrasting pairs of related groups of insect species differing in the opportunity for postmating sexual conflict. Groups where females mate with many males exhibited speciation rates four times as high as in related groups where females mate only once. Our results not only highlight the general importance of postmating sexual selection in speciation, but also support the recent suggestion that sexual conflict is a key engine of speciation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Germany 5 1%
Brazil 5 1%
Spain 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Hungary 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 442 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 108 22%
Researcher 102 20%
Student > Master 47 9%
Student > Bachelor 47 9%
Professor 40 8%
Other 108 22%
Unknown 46 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 374 75%
Environmental Science 23 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 2%
Social Sciences 3 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 58 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,741,542
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#91,769
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,108
of 38,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#407
of 425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.