↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the Utility of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo in Discriminating Among DSM-IV ADHD Subtypes

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the Utility of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo in Discriminating Among DSM-IV ADHD Subtypes
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10802-009-9355-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly M. Harrington, Irwin D. Waldman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,411
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,345
of 102,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.