| Title |
The Role of Fidelity and Feedback in the Wraparound Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Child and Family Studies, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10826-005-9008-7 |
| Authors |
Benjamin M. Ogles, David Carlston, Derek Hatfield, Gregorio Melendez, Kathy Dowell, Scott A. Fields |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#1,007
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,017
of 158,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.