↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Cues to Deception vs. Topic Incriminating Potential in Criminal Confessions

Overview of attention for article published in Law and Human Behavior, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Behavioral Cues to Deception vs. Topic Incriminating Potential in Criminal Confessions
Published in
Law and Human Behavior, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10979-005-7370-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martha Davis, Keith A. Markus, Stan B. Walters, Neal Vorus, Brenda Connors

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Spain 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 49 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 58%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Linguistics 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Law and Human Behavior
#708
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,093
of 160,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law and Human Behavior
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.