| Title |
Gambling Motivation and Passion: A Comparison Study of Recreational and Pathological Gamblers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10899-010-9212-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ki-Joon Back, Choong-Ki Lee, Randy Stinchfield |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 26% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#692
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,080
of 103,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.