↓ Skip to main content

Adolescents’ Acceptance of Same-Sex Peers Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Expression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Adolescents’ Acceptance of Same-Sex Peers Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Expression
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10964-006-9111-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Staccy S. Horn

Abstract

This study investigated tenth- and twelfth-grade adolescents' (N ≤ 264) judgments about the acceptability of same-sex peers who varied in terms of their sexual orientation (straight, gay or lesbian) and their conformity to gender conventions or norms in regard appearance and mannerisms or activity. Overall, the results of this study suggest that adolescents' conceptions of the acceptability of their peers are related not just to sexual orientation but also conformity to gender conventions. Both straight and gay or lesbian individuals who were non-conventional in their appearance and mannerisms were rated as less acceptable than individuals who conformed to gender conventions or those who participated in non-conventional activities. Most surprisingly, for boys, the straight individual who was non-conforming in appearance was rated less acceptable than either the gay individual who conformed to gender norms or was gender non-conforming in choice of activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 128 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 39%
Social Sciences 31 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 31 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,701,746
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#958
of 1,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,920
of 91,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.