Title |
Investigating the Role of a Large, Shared Display in Multi-Display Environments
|
---|---|
Published in |
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10606-011-9149-8 |
Authors |
James R. Wallace, Stacey D. Scott, Eugene Lai, Deon Jajalla |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Greece | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 31% |
Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
Researcher | 14 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 59 | 66% |
Design | 5 | 6% |
Engineering | 5 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#201
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,476
of 144,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.