↓ Skip to main content

The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
283 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
Authors

Elena Florit, Kate Cain

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 218 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 18%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Professor 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 54 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 33%
Social Sciences 45 20%
Linguistics 23 10%
Arts and Humanities 9 4%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 65 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#709
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,221
of 138,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.