↓ Skip to main content

Diversity and function of prevalent symbiotic marine bacteria in the genus Endozoicomonas

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Diversity and function of prevalent symbiotic marine bacteria in the genus Endozoicomonas
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00253-016-7777-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J. Neave, Amy Apprill, Christine Ferrier-Pagès, Christian R. Voolstra

Abstract

Endozoicomonas bacteria are emerging as extremely diverse and flexible symbionts of numerous marine hosts inhabiting oceans worldwide. Their hosts range from simple invertebrate species, such as sponges and corals, to complex vertebrates, such as fish. Although widely distributed, the functional role of Endozoicomonas within their host microenvironment is not well understood. In this review, we provide a summary of the currently recognized hosts of Endozoicomonas and their global distribution. Next, the potential functional roles of Endozoicomonas, particularly in light of recent microscopic, genomic, and genetic analyses, are discussed. These analyses suggest that Endozoicomonas typically reside in aggregates within host tissues, have a free-living stage due to their large genome sizes, show signs of host and local adaptation, participate in host-associated protein and carbohydrate transport and cycling, and harbour a high degree of genomic plasticity due to the large proportion of transposable elements residing in their genomes. This review will finish with a discussion on the methodological tools currently employed to study Endozoicomonas and host interactions and review future avenues for studying complex host-microbial symbioses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 234 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 22%
Researcher 36 15%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 18%
Environmental Science 32 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 65 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,764,500
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,373
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,768
of 347,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#20
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.