↓ Skip to main content

Brook Taylor and the method of increments

Overview of attention for article published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences, March 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Brook Taylor and the method of increments
Published in
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, March 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00329903
Authors

L. Feigenbaum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 6%
France 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 18%
Mathematics 3 18%
Arts and Humanities 2 12%
Physics and Astronomy 2 12%
Energy 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#85
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,718
of 9,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.