You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biofuels from food processing wastes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Opinion in Biotechnology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.01.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhanying Zhang, Ian M O’Hara, Sagadevan Mundree, Baoyu Gao, Andrew S Ball, Nanwen Zhu, Zhihui Bai, Bo Jin |
| Abstract |
Food processing industry generates substantial high organic wastes along with high energy uses. The recovery of food processing wastes as renewable energy sources represents a sustainable option for the substitution of fossil energy, contributing to the transition of food sector towards a low-carbon economy. This article reviews the latest research progress on biofuel production using food processing wastes. While extensive work on laboratory and pilot-scale biosystems for energy production has been reported, this work presents a review of advances in metabolic pathways, key technical issues and bioengineering outcomes in biofuel production from food processing wastes. Research challenges and further prospects associated with the knowledge advances and technology development of biofuel production are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 15% |
| Unknown | 74 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 39 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 14% |
| Unknown | 93 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,528,938
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#1,233
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,559
of 409,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#29
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.