| Title |
Measurement issues in the evaluation of chronic disease self-management programs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-012-0317-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Nolte, Gerald R. Elsworth, Stanton Newman, Richard H. Osborne |
| Abstract |
To provide an in-depth analysis of outcome measures used in the evaluation of chronic disease self-management programs consistent with the Stanford curricula. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 100 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,297,256
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,295
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,126
of 276,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.