↓ Skip to main content

Heptane as a less toxic option than hexane for the separation of vitamin E from food products using normal phase HPLC

Overview of attention for article published in RSC Advances, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heptane as a less toxic option than hexane for the separation of vitamin E from food products using normal phase HPLC
Published in
RSC Advances, January 2013
DOI 10.1039/c3ra44442b
Authors

Oliver Buddrick, Oliver A. H. Jones, Paul D. Morrison, Darryl M. Small

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 25%
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 25%
Engineering 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Materials Science 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,794,514
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from RSC Advances
#2,453
of 14,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,110
of 289,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RSC Advances
#147
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.