You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A quantitative framework for the formation of liquid marbles and hollow granules from hydrophobic powders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Powder Technology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.05.007 |
| Authors |
Nicky Eshtiaghi, Karen P. Hapgood |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 17 | 32% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 17% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Powder Technology
#120
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,072
of 179,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Powder Technology
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.