You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fishing on chips: Up‐and‐coming technological advances in analysis of zebrafish and Xenopus embryos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cytometry Part A, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cyto.a.22571 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feng Zhu, Joanna Skommer, Yushi Huang, Jin Akagi, Dany Adams, Michael Levin, Chris J. Hall, Philip S. Crosier, Donald Wlodkowic |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 9 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,214,823
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Cytometry Part A
#297
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,302
of 259,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytometry Part A
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.