You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combinatorial Study of Ceramic Tape-Casting Slurries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Combinatorial Science, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1021/co200148q |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhifu Liu, Yiling Wang, Yongxiang Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 23 | 43% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,719,388
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from ACS Combinatorial Science
#48
of 361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,158
of 248,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Combinatorial Science
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 361 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.