↓ Skip to main content

A Critique of the Bucket Classification of Journals: The ABDC List as an Example

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Record, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Critique of the Bucket Classification of Journals: The ABDC List as an Example
Published in
Economic Record, April 2016
DOI 10.1111/1475-4932.12258
Authors

Imad A. Moosa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 17%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#19,985,639
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from Economic Record
#444
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,519
of 306,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Record
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.