Title |
A systematic review of interventions to enhance access to best practice primary health care for chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-415 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth Jean Comino, Gawaine Powell Davies, Yordanka Krastev, Marion Haas, Bettina Christl, John Furler, Anthony Raymont, Mark F Harris |
Abstract |
Although primary health care (PHC) is a key component of all health care systems, services are not always readily available, accessible or affordable. This systematic review examines effective strategies to enhance access to best practice processes of PHC in three domains: chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 33% |
Spain | 3 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Scientists | 5 | 28% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Malawi | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 199 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 44 | 21% |
Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
Other | 19 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
Other | 49 | 23% |
Unknown | 34 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 38% |
Social Sciences | 25 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 5% |
Psychology | 10 | 5% |
Other | 29 | 14% |
Unknown | 40 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,726,879
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,157
of 7,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,877
of 279,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#14
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.