You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
FROM BEST INTERESTS TO BETTER INTERESTS? VALUES, UNWISDOM AND OBJECTIVITY IN MENTAL CAPACITY LAW
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cambridge Law Journal, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0008197321000283 |
Authors |
John Coggon, Camillia Kong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Central African Republic | 1 | 4% |
Singapore | 1 | 4% |
Turkey | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 43% |
Scientists | 10 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 22% |
Philosophy | 1 | 11% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 11% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,767,230
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Law Journal
#11
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,444
of 455,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Law Journal
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them