You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Presence‐only modelling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12004 |
| Authors |
Charles B. Yackulic, Richard Chandler, Elise F. Zipkin, J. Andrew Royle, James D. Nichols, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Sophie Veran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 8 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 3% |
| Brazil | 10 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Australia | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| India | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 44 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1296 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 338 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 291 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 222 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 105 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 5% |
| Other | 199 | 14% |
| Unknown | 200 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 679 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 358 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 41 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 2% |
| Engineering | 20 | 1% |
| Other | 52 | 4% |
| Unknown | 247 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,083,364
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#971
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,197
of 288,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.